Encouraging the Entrepreneurial Spirit in Southern Muntenia Region
Given the growing importance and the visible impact of entrepreneurship on wealth creation and job creation, we considered it essential for Romania to promote and develop such research. We are committed to this study for explore the factors that have advanced the entrepreneurship in Romania as well as other factors that could encourage and even further increase more this concept. As such, the development of Entrepreneurship in a particular environment does not depend on one imperative factor, but rather on a "constellation of factors" at individual, social and national levels. Entrepreneurship depends on individual motivations and experiences, socio-cultural (including family) traditions, educational opportunities, relevant skills and attitudes, financial support through access to optimal credit, support through an efficient transport and communications facilities, macroeconomic environment and the national policy stability. It is also known that innovation and entrepreneurship are best developing in decentralization systems, by people who are willing to face and explore new ideas and deal with exogenous influences. Taking into account the key role in creating value for entrepreneurship, the methodology adopted for the preparation of this article, it's based on the one-to-one interviews with 80 entrepreneurs from different entities, as well as gathering of information received from consultations with other relevant stakeholders within the entrepreneurship ecosystem (such as educational institutions, financial communities, chambers of commerce, business associations etc.) in the South Muntenia region.
Mario Rutten, Farms and Factories: Social Profiles of Large Farmers and Rural Industrialists in Western India, Oxford University Press 1995; 23.
Stevenson, H. H., Amabile, T. M. Entrepreneurial Management: In Pursuit of Opportunity, In The Intellectual Venture Capitalist: John H. McArthur and the Work of the Harvard Business School, 1980-1995, edited by McCraw T. K., Cruikshank, Jeffrey, L., Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1999.
Bhide A. How Entrepreneurs Craft, Harvard Business Review; March-April; 1994.
Morales-Gualdron S.T., Roig S. The New Venture Decision: An Analysis based on the GEM Project Data Base, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 2005; 1(4); 479-499.
Baumol W. J. Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive and Destructive, The Journal of Political Economy; 1990: 98 (5) Part 1; 893-921.
Mamede, R. R., Davidsson, P., Entrepreneurship and Economic Development - How Can Entrepreneurial Activity Contribute to Wealth Distribution, International Conference on Entrepreneurship Research in Latin America; 11-13 November; Rio de Janeiro; 2004.
Svilokos, A., Carraher, S. M., A Comparison of Social with Traditional Entrepreneurship. Proceedings of Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship Conference; Corpus Christi, Texas, USA; 2006.
Oprea C., Popescu D. M., Petrescu A. G., Barbu I., A data mining based model to improve university management. JOSA year 17 no. 2 (39); section A – Mathematic, 2017, eISSN 2068-3049; 285.
Copyright (c) 2019 LUMEN Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited