Reducing Regional Disparities: SME’s Support Funding Distribution and Effects in the Regions

  • Liliana-Olivia Lucaciu PhD candidate, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
Keywords: impact evaluation, smart growth, competitiveness, regional policies, antitative methods

Abstract

The research was conducted in the context of shifting the focus of regional policies from supporting the development of all regions towards the reduction of inter and intraregional disparities. A second contextual element is the stronger recognition of the research potential to build more knowledge for the continuous improvement of the policy making.
The paper aims at providing a model for linking the regional policy objectives, instruments, implementation methods and practice with the effects produced in the regions to inform future policies and address better the new challenges raised by the economic development disparities and social inequalities.
The research was focused on the eight development regions of Romania and the SMEs support funding provided through the Regional Operational Programme 2017-2013, using an extensive database with more than 2 100 beneficiaries of funding including data on the development projects implemented as well as on their business performance before and after the project implementation. The research looks at regional differences of the distribution of funding, typology of interventions and their effects as well their links with specific features of the regional disparities before and after the programme implementation. Most relevant factors influencing the impact of the funding on the business performance were analysed, including sizes of the business, location, sector, sizes of the funding.
The research highlights the need to adapt the approaches and instruments to the multi-dimensional problem of regional disparities using empirical evidence provided through multidisciplinary research.

 

References

Bachtler J, Mendez C. Regional Policy in a Changing Europe, Annual Review of the Regional Policy in Europe [Internet]. Eprc-strath.eu. 2018 [cited 12 January 2019]. Available from: http://www.eprc-strath.eu/public/dam/jcr:1067b233-6c66-4e6e-abf8-601373becd00/EoRPA%20Paper%2017_1.pdf.

Bondonio D. Impact identification strategies for evaluating business incentive programs. POLIS Working Papers 129, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice – POLIS; 2009. Retrieved from http://polis.unipmn.it/pubbl/RePEc/uca/ucapdv/bondonio145.pdf

Garcia C, Sanz-Menéndez L. Competition for funding as an indicator of research competitiveness. Scientometrics. 2005;64(3):271-300.

Guvernul Romaniei. Programul Operational Regional 2007-2013. 2007

Goschin Z, Constantin D, Ileanu B, Roman M. The current state and dynamics of regional disparities in Romania. Romanian Journal of Regional Science. 2006;2(2).

Lucaciu L. A Look at the Evaluation Framework for Smart Growth Programmes. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensională. 2018;10(3):60-67.

European Commission. Expert seminar on the use of Cohesion policy funding to support growth and job creation in the EU [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2013/wp1_expert_seminar_summary.pdf

Bachtler J, Begg I. Beyond Brexit: Reshaping policies for regional development in Europe. Papers in Regional Science. 2018;97(1):151-170

Guvernul Romaniei. Raportul final de implementare POR 2007-2013 [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://www.fonduri-ue.ro/por-2007#rezultate

European Union. Regions of the European Union, Nomenclature of the territorial unit for statistics NUTS 213/EU-28. Publications Office of the European Union; 2015.

Roman M, Gotiu (Lucaciu) L. Non-parametric methods applied in the efficiency analysis of European structural funding in Romania. Journal of Applied Quantitative Method. 2017;12(2).

Bachtrögler J, Hammer. Who are the beneficiaries of the structural funds and the cohesion fund and how does the cohesion policy impact firm-level performance? [Internet]. Ideas.repec.org. 2018. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ecoaaa/1499-en.html

Published
2019-10-08