Driving Sustainable Public Administration
Rediscovering sustainability as a source for developing strategic and organizational change helps drive public administration to proceed towards future by promoting the organizational dimension that relies on enhancing the quality of people as human resources, strengthening public managers as leaders and public servants as employees committed and motivated to public services. Sustainable public administration improves performances, supports public trust and enhances democratic life. Rediscovering the organizational dimension as a means to promote sustainability within public administration helps develop ethical and organizational culture within public administration and enables people to adopt new values, attitudes and behaviors. Developing sustainability within public administration relies on strengthening the behavioral and human dimension in order to enable both processes of change and advance ethics-oriented policies and initiatives within public organizations. Promoting an effective public management requires people able to behave as ethical and transformational leaders who motivate, support and drive the employees at work. Investing in human resources requires to develop education and training programs and policies that contribute to sustaining public service motivation and improving competences of employees who assume behaviors and adopt values in order to drive sustainable and ethical-oriented process of innovation and change within public administration as an organization that serves the public interest and contributes to value creation within community.
Todres E. La dimensione etica nella pubblica amministrazione. Problemi di Amministrazione Pubblica [The ethical dimension in public administration. Public administration problems]. 1994; 19(3): 379-386.
Fiorino DJ. Sustainability as a conceptual focus for public administration. Public Administration Review. 2010; 79(s1): s78-s88.
Goodsell CE. A new vision for public administration. Public Administration Review. 2006; 66(4): 623-635.
Haugh HM, Talwar A. How do corporations embed sustainability across the organizations?. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 2010; 9(3): 384-396.
Denyer D, Tranfield D. Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision. 2006; 44(2): 213-227.
O’Flynn J. From New Public Management to Public Value: paradigmatic change and manageriale implications. The American Journal of Public Administration. 2007; 66(3): 353-366.
Denhardt RB, Denhardt JV. The New Public Service: putting democracy first. National Civic Review. 2001; 90(4): 391-400.
Moynihan DP, Pandey SK. The role of organisations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review. 2007; 67(1): 40-53.
Vigoda E. Are you being served? The responsiveness of public administration to citizens’ demands: an empirical examination in Israel. Public Administration. 2000; 78(1): 165-191.
Behn RD. The New Public Management Paradigm and the search for democratic accountability. International Public Management Journal. 1998; 1(2): 131-164.
Moore MH. Creating Public Value. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1995.
Borgonovi E. Il concetto di valore pubblico. Azienda pubblica. 2001; 14(2-3): 185-188.
Valotti G. Riforme istituzionali e cambiamento manageriale: un’alleanza per il futuro della PA. Rivista Italiana di Public Management [Institutional reforms and managerial change: an alliance for the future of the PA. Italian magazine of Public Management]. 2018; 1(1): 75-78.
Du Gay P. The Values of Bureaucracy: New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
Bryer TA. Toward a relevant agenda for a responsive public administration: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2007; 17(3): 479-500.
Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Bloombeg L. Public value governance: moving beyond traditional public administration and New Public Management. Public Administration Review. 2014; 74(4): 445-456.
Hassan S, Wright BE, Yukl G. Does ethical leadership matter in government? Effects on organizational commitment, absenteeism, and willingness to report ethical problems. Public Administration Theory. 2014; 74(3): 333-343.
Wright BE, Moynihan DP, Pandey SK. Pulling the Levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation and mission valence. Public Administration Review. 2012; 72(2): 206-215.
Park SM, Rainey HG. Leadership and public service motivation in US federal agencies. American Review of Public Administration. 2008; 11(1): 109-142.
Moynihan DP, Pandey SK. The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review. 2007; 67(2): 40-53.
Kim S, Vandenabeele W. A strategy for building public service motivation research internationally. Public administration review. 2010; 70(5): 701-709.
Rainey HG, Steinbauer P. Galloping elephants: developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1999; 9(1): 1-32.
Gould-Williams J. The importance of HR practices and workplace trust in achieving superior performance: a study of public-sector organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 1999; 14(1): 28-54.
Stachowicz-Stanusch A. The implementation of principles for responsible Management Education in practice-research results. Journal of Intercultural Management. 2011; 3(2): 241-257.
Reichard C. Education and training for new public management. International Public Management Journal. 1998; 1(2): 177-194.
Copyright (c) 2020 LUMEN Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited