Does Globalisation Promote Sustainable Development and an Equal Distribution of Income around the World? An Econometric and Ethical View
Abstract
The paper deals with the two ethical aspects related to globalisation impact on: (i) sustainable development and (ii) distribution on income in the world economy. Times series covering the period of 1990 to 2015 of statistical indicators reflecting globalisation, sustainable development and national income for 134 economies are explored. The methodology of the paper consists of a panel data analysis including as variables: the sustainable development index (SDI), the KOF index of globalisation. The standard deviation of GDP per capita in the 134 economies is calculated and analysed. The findings show a positive weak bi-directional link between globalisation and sustainable development accompanied with a worsening of income inequality in the examined period of time.
References
Sustainable development index. Available from: https://www.sustainabledevelopmentindex.org/
Dreher A. Does Globalization Affect Growth? Empirical Evidence from a new Index Globalization. App. Econ. 2006; 38 (10), 1091-1110.
KOF, Index of Globalization. Available from: http://globalization.kof.ethz.ch/ Accessed 27 April 2020.
Dollar D, Kraay A. Trade, growth and poverty. Econ. J. 2004; 114 (493), F22-49.
Villaverde J, Maza A. Globalisation, growth and convergence. World Econ. 2011; 34(6), 952-971.
Chang C-P, Lee C.-C. Globalization and Economic Growth: A Political Economy Analysis for OECD countries, Global Econ.Rev.2010; 39 (2), 151-173.
Shaikh FM, Shah, MA. Impact of Globalization on Pakistan’s Economy by Using CGE Model. Int. Conf. Appl. Econ. 2008: 839-845.
Rao BB, Tamazian A, Krishna VC. Growth effects of a comprehensive measure of globalization with country-specific time series data. Appl. Econ. 2011; 43 (5), 51–568.
Ray S. Globalization and Economic Growth in India: A Granger Causality Approach. J. Law.Pol. Glob. 2012; 2, 18-30.
Meraj M. Impact of globalization and trade openness on economic growth in Bangladesh. Ritsumeikan J. Asia Pacific St. 2013; 32, 40-50.
Wade, R. H. Is globalisation reducing poverty and inequality? World Dev. 2004; 32(4), 567–589.
Dreher A, Gaston N. Has globalisation increased inequality?. Rev. Int. Econ 2008; 16(3), 516–536.
Potrafke N. The evidence on globalisation. World Econ. 2015; 38(3), 509–552.
Gozgor, G, Ranjan P. Globalisation, inequality and redistribution: Theory and evidence. World Econ. 2017; 40(12), 2704–2751.
Berg A, Ostry JD, Zettelmeyer J. What makes growth sustained? J. Dev. Econ. 2012; 98(2), 149–166.
Ostry JD, Berg A, Tsangarides CG. Redistribution, inequality, and growth. IMF Staff Discussion Note, 2014; 14/02.
Waller-Hunter J, Jones T. Globalisation and sustainable development, Int. Rev. Env. Strategy. 2002; 3(1), 53-62.
Martens P, Raza M. Is globalisation sustainable?. Sust. 2010; 2, 280-293.
Tisdell C. Globalisation and sustainability: environmental Kuznets Curve and the WTO. Ecol. Econ. 2001; 39, 185-196.
Ciegis R, Gavenauskas A, Petkeviciute N, Streimikiene D. Ethical values of sustainable development in Lithuania, Tech.Econ.Dev.Econ. 2008; 14 (1), 29-37.
Hickel J.The sustainable development index: measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene, Ecol.Econ. 2020; 167, 160331.
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J. Econom. 2002; 108 (1), 1–24.
Pedroni P. Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors. Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 1999; 61, 653–70.
Pedroni P. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econ.Th. 2004; 20 (03), 597-625. Retrieved from: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wil:wileco:2001-01. Accessed 29 April 2020
Pedroni P. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In: Badi H. Baltagi, Thomas B. Fomby, R. Carter Hill (eds). Advances in Econometrics, Volume 15: Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, 2001a; 93-130. https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15004-2 Accessed 29 April 2020
Pedroni P. Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2001b; 83 (4), 727–731.
Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ.Mod. 2012; 29 (4), 1450–1460.
Copyright (c) 2020 LUMEN Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.