Aspects on Assessment Deontology of Teachers
In the context of the increase in the quality of the didactic act, the research on the report between the causes and the results which are activating the educational context, the reductionalist temptations and the ways of avoiding them, constitute a priority of the educational sciences. The quality of the didactic activity results, most of the time, from the competence with which the didactic staff manages to obtain good results which correspond to their settled goals, as part of organized and intentionally unfolded activities. The efficiency and efficaciousness with which a pedagogue manages to unify the three major activities of the educational process – teaching, learning and evaluation – do not reflect only the pedagogical competences and their skilfulness, but also their moral qualities. Thus some of the moral principles and values are reflected in the style of teaching, in ,,the personal equation of the teacher”, as a sign of subjectivism, from the act of evaluation, in the typology of the relationships he/she has with the pupils, with the parents or with the academic community that he/she belongs to. Besides the problem of the subjectivism of the evaluation and its moral connotations, we might mention some other aspects which can be associated directly or indirectly with the pedagogue’s moral code. Their analysis imposes a deontological approach.
 Caciuc VT. The Role of Virtue Ethics in the Deontological Training of Prospective Teachers. In Sandu A, Frunză A, editors. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty. Section: Social Sciences. Year III. Issue 1.Iaşi. Lumen Publishing House. pp. 47-56.
 Jeder D. Teachers' Ethic Responsibilities in the Practice of Education and Training.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013; 92:432–436.
 Jeder D. Valori etice în discursul educational .In Sandu A, Popoveniuc B. (coord). Etică şi integritate în educaţie şi cercetare .Bucureşti: Editura Tritonic; 2018. pp. 67-109.
 Kant I. Întemeierea metafizicii moravurilor .In Kant I. Critica raţiunii practice.Bucureşti:Editura IRI; 1995.
 Krueger RA, Casey MA.Metoda focus grup: ghid practice pentru cercetarea aplicată Iaşi: Editura Polirom; 2005.
 LévinasE. Întrenoi. Încercarea de a-l gândipeCelîlalt, Bucureşti:Editura ALL; 2000.
 Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale (MEN). Metodologia – cadru de organizare şi desfăşurarea examenului naţional de definitivare în învăţământ (2018). Anexa la OMEN nr. 5211/02.10.2018. Available from: http://definitivat.edu.ro/2019/docs/Metodologie%20si%20anexe%20MO.pdf
 Program de formare privind dezvoltarea competenţelor de evaluare a cadrelor didactice pentru examenul de definitivat şi concursul naţional pentru ocuparea posturilor vacante, Furnizor program formare acreditat: Casa Corpului Didactic Galaţi, Nr. OM de acreditare/data: 5990/16.12.2015.
 Rachels J. Introducere în etică. Bucureşti: Editura Punct; 2000.
 Voiculescu E. Evaluarea şcolară şi deontologia profesiunii didactice. In Ionescu M, Chiş V. (coord.). Studii de pedagogie. Omagiu profesorului Dumitru Salade. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Presa Universitară Clujeană; 2000.pp.181-189.
 Voiculescu E. Factorii subiectivi ai evaluării şcolare. Cunoaştere şi control, Bucureşti: Editura Aramis; 2001.
Copyright (c) 2020 LUMEN Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited