Mediating Teaming and Design Thinking: Project Management in Architecture
Designing teams is quite important besides the dedication of the specialists’ team to the design thinking creativity, knowing that results to achieve and reality to build are not the only weights to balance. More, selecting a team is a matter of drafting the project design and following the rules with creativity, and finally, reaching objectives and managing results for the future. Dedication to necessary (professional) specialties is a criterion for first selection. The next criteria are related to the quick understanding of design, innovation and/or customization, speed and difficulties to meet. Designing a building, a project or a research is not very different in architecture field. Each focuses on several successive phases: defining the inputs and correlated contexts; pre-designing the targets-final products and their nature; forming the best team according to best expectations; planning the design. Since planning the design and the design itself are two products that are the dedicated work of the design leader/and PM, the team has to relate to the sense of conceptual, concrete and knowledge contents. The value of the design -understood as its planning as well as drafting- resides in the nature of advanced design thinking. Also the quality of the team derives from pairing specialties/specialists, co-working and the value of collaborative added value to the initial design theme. Mediating the two - teaming and design thinking- as components of performance in Project Management could lead to best/better architectural results, by testing the partial deliverables in reformatting drafting, communication, expectations and long terms maintenance. In parallel it might lead to decreasing the conflicts and saving time in manufacturing and scheduling the processes in between by oriented common targets. The points of convergence and divergence between practice, theory and architectural inquiries will be highlighted within extended article.
 Banica C., & Mihaila M. Setup Propositions in Architectural Design Thinking: Towards Control and Project Management. In: Sandu A, Frunza A, Gorghiu G, Ciongaru E, editors. LUMEN NASHS 2015: New Approaches in Social and Humanistic Sciences. Bologna: EDITOGRAFICA. 2015. pp. 51-54 WOS:000391521500009
 Banica C. Standard forms of construction contracts in Romania. UAC, NR&DI URBAN-INCERC. 2013. 4(4). pp. 97-104. http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v4n4a09.pdf (accessed 20 April 2017)
 Gottesman A. The architectural condition. Gottesman Publications. 2013
 Imrie R. & Street E. Architectural Design and Regulation. Wiley-Blackwell. 2011
 Jiricna E. & Brookes A. J. Production processes, sources and the uses of materials. In Innovation in Architecture. Son Press, Taylor & Francis Group. 2005. pp. 119-124
 Kirkland D. A process-oriented architecture. In Innovation in Architecture. Son Press, Taylor & Francis Group. 2005. pp. 49-66
 Nelson Ch. Managing quality in architecture. Architectural Press, Elsevier. 2006
 Piotrowski A. On the Practices of Representing and Knowing Architecture. in The Discipline of Architecture. University of Minnesota Press. 2001. p. 40-60
 Szokolay S. Introduction to Architectural Science: the basis of sustainable design. Architectural Press, Elsevier. 2004
 Thompson A. Architectural Design Procedures. # 2. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group: Architectural Press. 2012
Copyright (c) 2018 LUMEN Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited