Causes of Poverty – What Do the Poor Think? Poverty Attribution and Its Behavioural Effects
Abstract
The manner in which we conceptualize any aspect of reality impacts on the way we address it. Thus, causal attribution of any problem will determine the solutions we choose for it. In this paper we focus our research on exploring how people think about poverty and its causes in Romania. We want to identify potential differences in the causal attributions of poverty, considering both society as a whole and the view of the group of persons that are, in fact, confronted to this phenomenon. Thus, in our study, we analyse comparatively both the national perspective and the specific perspective of the vulnerable group of the beneficiaries of guaranteed minimum income (Law no. 416 of 2001 regarding the guaranteed minimum income, with changes and completions). We analyse data and information of thematic Eurobarometers, but also primary and very recent data collected through a survey with national statistic representativity for the social aid beneficiaries (guaranteed minimum income) - October 2016. We referred the data to the most commonly used taxonomy of poverty causes identified in the scientific literature, consisting of three categories – individualistic attribution, fatalistic attribution and structural causal attribution. In order to better understand the relation between the perceptions of poverty causes and the behaviour of the poor, we analysed them in connection to the three characteristics applied in the scientific literature on poverty attribution analysis: locus, stability and controllability.
References
[2] Costa L. P., Dias J. G. Perceptions of poverty attributions in Europe: A multilevel mixture model approach. Quality & Quantity. 2014; 48(3): 1409–1419.
[3] Costa L. P., Dias J. G. What do Europeans Believe to be the Causes of Poverty? A Multilevel Analysis of Heterogeneity Within and Between Countries. Social Indicators Research. 2015; 122(1): 1-20
[4] Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A., Tagler, M. Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues. 2001; 57(2): 207–227.
[5] Davids Y., Gouws A. Monitoring Perceptions of the Causes of Poverty in South Africa. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement. 2013; 110 (3): 1201-1220
[6] Davis E., Sanchez-Martinez M., Economic theories of poverty. An overview of the main economic theories relating to the causes of and responses to poverty in the UK, 2015, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, [Online] Available at: https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/economic-theories-poverty
[7] Feagin J. Poverty: We still believe that God helps who help themselves. Psychology Today. 1972; 6: 101–129
[8] Goffman I. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1963.
[9] Halman L., Van Oorschot W. Popular perceptions of poverty in Dutch society. (WORC paper; Vol. 99.11.01). Tilburg: WORC, Work and Organization Research Centre, 1999 [Online] Available at: https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/files/1256327/HLOW5620043.pdf
[10] Kreidl M. Perceptions of poverty and wealth in western and post-communist countries. Social Justice Research. 2000; 13(2): 151–176.
[11] Lepianka D., Gelissen J., & van Oorschot, W. Popular explanations of poverty in Europe: Effects of contextual and individual characteristics across 28 European countries. Acta Sociologica. 2000; 53(1): 53–72.
[12] Nasser R., Does Subjective Class Predict the Causal Attribution for Poverty?. Journal of Social Sciences. 2007; 3(4): 197-201.
[13] Nasser R., Abouchedid K., Khashan H. Perceptions of the causes of poverty comparing three national groups: Lebanon, Portugal, and South Africa. Current Research in Social Psychology. 2002; 8(7): 101–118.
[14] Niemela, M. Perceptions of the causes of poverty in Finland. Acta Sociologica. 2008; 51(1), 23–40.
[15] Tagler M. J., Cozzarelli C. Feelings toward the poor and beliefs about the causes of poverty: The role of affective-cognitive consistency in help-giving. The Journal of Psychology. 2013; 147(6): 517–539.
[16] Van Oorschot, W. Culture and social policy: A developing field of study. International Journal of Social Welfare, 2007; 16 (2): 129-139
[17] Van Oorschot, W., Halman, L. Blame or fate, individual or social? An international comparison of popular explanations of poverty. European Societies. 2000; 2(1): 1-28 [Online] Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=952C528DF6D8991E4C07E29A54B813C8?doi=10.1.1.514.8235&rep=rep1&type=pdf, pp. 16, pp.7
[18] Zucker G. S., Weiner B. Conservatorism and Perceptions of Poverty: An Attributional Analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1993; 23(12): 925–943
[19] Weiner B., Osborne D., Rudolph U. An Attributional Analysis of Reactions to Poverty: The Political Ideology of the Giver and the Perceived Morality of the Receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2010; XX(X):1-15, pp. 2
[20] Henry P. J, Reyna C, Weiner B. Hate welfare but help the poor: How the attributional content of stereotypes explains the paradox of reactions to the destitute in America. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2004; 34: 34-58. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02536.x
Copyright (c) 2017 LUMEN Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© LUMEN Proceedings Series 2022 . The LUMEN Proceedings Open Access volumes are distributed under the terms of the 