Kosovo Conflict and its Impact on European Security and Stability

  • Raluca Iulia IULIAN University assistant, PhD, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Romania
Keywords: inter-ethnic and inter-religious conflict, security and stability, province


In the international context created after the end of the Cold War the inter-ethnic and inter-religious conflicts are one of the main threats to the European and international security and stability. The conflicts appeared in the ex-Yugoslav and ex-Soviet spaces. The constructivist theory shows that people actively construct or create their own subjective representations of the objective reality. Knowledge is based on personal experiences and hypotheses of the environment. The conflict appeared between the Orthodox Serbs and the Muslim Albanians in the province of Kosovo. In the course of time the Muslim Albanians became a majority in the province. The Orthodox Serbs consider that Kosovo is a historical province of Serbia because there is the place of the Kosovo Polje Battle (1389), important moment in Serbs history. Although the battle was a defeat for the Serbs, they wanted this moment to be celebrated as a national day thanks to the bravery that they showed during the fight. Also, Kosovo represents the core of the Serb feudal state. The Kosovo conflict (1999) has led to the appearance of a new state on the map of Europe, Kosovo. It was recognized only by a part of the international community. The Kosovo conflict represents a dangerous precedent. This fact has important consequences for the European stability and security because the European states comprise a large mosaic of ethnicities and religions. The paper aims to analyze the impact of the Kosovo conflict on the European security and stability environment. The study is based on the comparative analysis of the press articles and the literature from March 1989 which represents the moment of the revocation of Kosovo’s autonomy until February 2017.


[1] Niţu N, Niţu I. Destrămarea Iugoslaviei. Bucureşti: Top Form; 2006. 146 p.
[2] Nye JS Jr. Descifrarea conflictelor internaţionale. Bucureşti: Antet; 2005. 247 p.
[3] Rockmore T. Hegel et le constructivisme épistémologique. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale. 2007 Janvier; 53: 103–113.
[4] Sandu A. Orientări metodologice privind dezvoltarea culturală a comunităţilor etnice. Iaşi: Editura Lumen; 2009. 200 p.
[5] Wendt A. Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organisation. 1992 Spring; 46(2): 391-425. Available from: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0020-8183%28199221%2946%3A2%3C391%3AAIWSMO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9
[6] Huntington S.P. Ciocnirea civilizaţiilor şi refacerea ordinii mondiale. Bucureşti: Antet; 1998. 528p.
[7] Papazoglu F. The Central Balkan Tribe in Pre-Roman Times: Triballi, Autariatae, Dardanians, Scordisci and Moesians. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert; 1978. 664 p.
[8] Executive summary War Crimes in Kosovo. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/kosovo/undword.htm
[9] Gârz F. Spre un nou război balcanic?. Bucureşti: Odeon; 1993. 175 p.
[10] de Mesquita BB. Principles of International Politics. 4th edition. Washington D.C.: CQ Press; 2010. 460 p.
[11] Tanner A, Stevenson R. 2010 July 22; Kosovo independence declaration deemed legal. Reuters. Available from: http://www.reuters.com/
[12] Court says Kosovo independence ‘not illegal‘. 2010 July 23. Available from: http://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/court-says-kosovo-independence-not-illegal/]
[13] Resolution 1244 Adopted by the Security Council at its 4011th meeting, on 10 June 1999. Available from: http://www.nato.int/kosovo/docu/u990610a.htm
[14] Putin: Recognition of Kosovo was a very dangerous precedent. 2008 March 10. Kosovo Compromise. Retrived from: http://www.kosovocompromise.
How to Cite
IULIAN, R. I. (2017). Kosovo Conflict and its Impact on European Security and Stability. LUMEN Proceedings, 1, 353-363. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.rsacvp2017.32