The Self-Efficacy of the Emerging Adult, Student or Graduate
Abstract
This research aimed to highlight a model of self-efficacy in emerging adults (ages 18/20 – 30 years). We selected a sample of 191 participants, students and graduates. Our goal was to identify the optimum period of intervention to prevent the abandon and capitalization of the latent abilities of these young people. According to a report of the NASOR [14], the rate of academic studies abandon is of 40 per cent. At the same time, there is a significant number of students or graduates who do not succeed to secure a position suitable to their academic training and thus the opportunity of enhancing the development area closest to them. Between the ages of 18 and 26 we noticed a decrease of the records of the perceived self-efficacy, with a minimum between 25 and 26 years. The reasons could be some artefacts coming from their adolescence period, the changing of the paradigm linked to the educational system (different in the academic environment), the tendency towards independence and the confrontation with difficulties in ensuring adequate material conditions, the low perception of the practical utility of the accumulated knowledge. We identified a peak of the high scores of self-efficacy, statistically significant, around the age of 27. The explanation may be due to positive changes such as: the first professional achievements, followed by the emergence of new career opportunities, the future oriented perspective regarding the foundation of a family. We did not ascertain gender regarding differences.
References
[2] Bandura, A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.) Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing; 2006.
[3] DiBenedetto, Maria K.; Bembenutty, Héfer. Within the pipeline: Self-regulated learning, self-efficacy, and socialization among college students in science courses. Learning & Individual Differences; 2013 Feb, 23: 218.
[4] Erlich, R. J, Russ-Eft, D. F. Assessing Student Learning in Academic Advising Using Social Cognitive Theory. NACADA Journal; 2013, 33(1):16.
[5] Karademas E. C, Kalantzi-Azizi, A. The stress process, self-efficacy expectations, and psychological health. Personality and Individual Differences. October 2004; 37(5):1033-1043.
[6] Judge, T. A, Bono, J. E. Relationship of Core Self-Evaluations Traits–Self-Esteem, Generalized Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and Emotional Stability–With Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001 Feb; 86(1): 80.
[7] Popa, M. Statistică pentru psihologie. Iasi: Polirom; 2008.
[8] Racu, I. Teoriile psihologice ale dezvoltării. Suport de curs. Univ. Pedagogică de Stat „I. Creangă”, Fac. de Psihologie şi Psihopedagogie Spec., Catedra de Psihologie, Chişinău, 2013.
[9] Sava, F. A. Psihologia validată științific. Iași: Polirom; 2013.
[10] Schwarzer, R, Jerusalem, M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In Editor Weinman, J., Editor Wright, S, Editor Johnston, M. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor, England: NFER-NELSON; 1995, p. 35-37.
[11] Van Der Westhuizen, S, De Beer, M, Bekwa, N. Psychological Strengths as Predictors of Postgraduate Students' Academic Achievement. Journal of Psychology in Africa; 2011, 21(3): 473.
[12] Vasiliu, D. Corelații dintre sensul coerenței și autoeficacitate. Revista de studii psihologice. 2016 mai; 4: 113-119.
[13] Vasiliu, D, Marinescu, D. A, Marinescu, G, Golu, I. Evaluarea Autoeficacității. Proprietăți psihometrice pentru Self Efficacity Scale SES. Revista de studii psihologice. 2015 mai, 2: 210-222.
[14] ANOSR. Accesul la educație – mai mult o provocare decât un drept. Bucuresti; 2015 August 19. Available from: http://www.anosr.ro/accesul-la-educatie-mai-mult-o-provocare-decat-un-drept/ .
[15] Institutul National de Statistica. Durata medie a vietii pe medii de rezidenta, sexe, pe macroregiuni, regiuni de dezvoltare si judete. Bucuresti. Available from: http://statistici.insse.ro/shop/index.jsp?page=tempo3&lang=ro&ind=POP217A .
[16] Hotarirea 4CN/2013 Monitotul Oficial 715 din 20-noi-2013. Available from: https://copsi.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/9.-hotarirea-nr.-4cn-2013-cd-si-cpd.pdf .
Copyright (c) 2017 LUMEN Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.