The Symbolic Significance of Architecture

  • Inna A. VERSHININA Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russian Federation
  • Artemiy R. KURBANOV Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russian Federation
Keywords: urban studies, space, “places of memory”, symbolic legacy of cities, capitals, Moscow, Bucharest, metropolitan cities, Eastern Europe

Abstract

The article deals with the process of cities’ changes considered in the context of the formation and transformation of historical and cultural memory. Every moment of a city’s existence is a combination of “places of memory”. Each of them plays its role in the general symbolic ensemble. Urban development is connecting with transformation of social and political systems. Any social and political change is expressed by creation of new and destruction of old “places of memory” in the urban space. This connection becomes even more evident if we study the history and contemporary state of the capital cities. Traditionally, capitals bear a maximum symbolic load. The development of Moscow during the Soviet period shows how architectural solutions and urban space in general express the new socialist ideology. Soviet authorities strove to affirm their values and priorities with all the means they had, including the new image of communist Moscow. The collapse of Soviet regime became a new stage of development of the urban space. For certain architectural facilities, a fragile border between oblivion and destruction and preservation of an architectural monument with its official acknowledgment depends on multiple circumstances. These include purely pragmatic aspects related to the cost of preservation and reconstruction of the facility, ideological aspects as far as many facilities are a live reminder of the past that is sometimes rather embarrassing. The destiny of “houses-communes” in post-Soviet Moscow and Casa Parlamentului in Bucharest can serve as examples. The article concludes that the process of accelerated modernization changed the face of metropolitan cities in Eastern Europe.

References

[1] Alden J, Crow S, Beigulenko Y. Moscow: Planning for a world capital city towards 2000. Cities. 1998; 15(5): 361–374.
[2] Assmann A, Shortt L. Memory and Political Change: Introduction. In: Assmann A, Shortt L, editors. Memory and Political Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies; 2012. 1-14 p.
[3] Assmann A. Canon and Archive. In: Erll A, Nünning A, editors. Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter; 2008. 97-108 p.
[4] Assmann J. Communicative and Cultural Memory. In: Erll A, Nünning A, editors. Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter; 2008. 109-118p.
[5] Assmann J. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Munich: Beck; 1992. 368 p.
[6] Behrends JC. Modern Moscow: Russia’s Metropolis and the State from Tsarism to Stalinism. In: Behrends JC, Kohlrausch M, editors. Races to Modernity: Metropolitan Aspirations in Eastern Europe, 1890-1940. Budapest; New York: Central European University Press; 2014. 101-124 p.
[7] Confino A. Collective Memory and Cultural History: Problems of Method. American Historical Review. 1997; 105(2): 1386-1403.
[8] Dobrinskaya DE. Sociological understanding of internet: theoretical approaches to the network analysis. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2016; 22(4): 43-64. (In Russ.)
[9] Echterhoff G., Higgins T, Kopietz R., Groll S. How Communication Goals Determine When Audience Tuning Biases Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2008; 137(1): 3-21.
[10] Halbwachs M. The collective memory. New York: Harper & Row Colophon Books; 1980. 182 p.
[11] Hebel UJ. Places of memory in U.S.-American Histories and Cultures. In: Erll A, Nünning A, editors. Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter; 2008. 47-60 p.
[12] Kazakevich AN. Place symbols: forgetting and fragmentation of the “Soviet” in the Minsk landscape. NZ: Debates on politics and culture. 2011; 80(6): 17-33.
[13] Kurbanov AR. The manifestation of historical memory in political practice. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2016; 22(1): 200-214. (In Russ.) DOI:10.24290/1029-3736-2016-22-1-200-214
[14] Lefebvre H. Le droit à la ville. 3e édition. Paris: Economica-Anthropos; 2015. 148 p.
[15] Lefebvre H. La production de l’espace. 4e édition. Paris: Anthropos; 2000. 492 p.
[16] Light D, Young C. Reconfiguring socialist urban landscapes: The ‘leftover’ space of state-socialism in Bucharest. Human Geographies – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography. 2010; 4(1): 5-16.
[17] Harris E. Мoscow Нeritage at Сrisis Point. Мoscow: NFP; 2009. 304 p.
[18] Mumford L. The Culture of Cities. San Diego. New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1970. 634 p.
[19] Neumann B. The Literary Representation of Memory. In: Erll A, Nünning A, editors. Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter; 2008. 333-344 p.
[20] Nora P. Les lieux de mémoire. 3 vols. Paris: Gallimard; 1984-1992.
[21] Portnov A, Portnov T. The capital of stagnation? Brezhnev's Myth of Dnepropetrovsk. NZ: Debates on politics and culture. 2014; 97(5): 71-87. (In Russ.)
[22] Behrends JC, Kohlrausch M. Races to Modernity: Metropolitan Aspirations in Eastern Europe, 1890-1940. Budapest; New York: Central European University Press; 2014. 356 p.
[23] Rudolph R., Brade I. Moscow: Processes of restructuring in the post-Soviet metropolitan periphery. Cities. 2005; 22(2): 135-150. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.005
[24] Simmel G. The Metropolis and Mental Life. In: Levine D. N., editor. Simmel: On individuality and social forms (Heritage of Sociology Series). Chicago: Chicago University Press;1971. 324-339 p.
[25] Therborn G. Eastern drama. Capital cities of Eastern Europe, 1830-2006. International Review of Sociology. 2006; 16(2): 209-242. DOI: 10.1080/03906700600708816
[26] Therborn G. Monumental Europe: on the iconography of European capital cities. Housing, Theory and Society. 2002; 19(1): pp. 26-47. DOI: 10.1080/140360902317417976
[27] Ushakin SA. Building a story: the Soviet past today. NZ: Debates on politics and culture. 2011; 80(6): 10-16. (In Russ.)
[28] Vershinina IA, Polyakova NL. Moscow: capital - global city - agglomeration. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2014; 20(4): 122-137. (In Russ.). DOI:10.24290/1029-3736-2014-0-4-122-137
[29] Welzer H. Communicative Memory. In: Erll A, Nünning A, editors. Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter; 2008. 285-300 p.
Published
2017-08-18
How to Cite
VERSHININA, I. A., & KURBANOV, A. R. (2017). The Symbolic Significance of Architecture. LUMEN Proceedings, 1, 992-1006. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.rsacvp2017.90