Psychological Features of the Tolerance of Future Specialists in Socionomic Professions
Abstract
It is a set on the basis of theoretical researchers, that the modern specialist of the sphere of «Man-Man», except the certain volume of professional abilities and knowledge, must own personality-mature qualities: to show readiness for self-development and self-perfection; make a decision on their own; have their own system of values and be able to correlate their own vital persuasions with the senses and stereotypes of society. For this reason, development of their tolerance as a constituent of professionalism is important in the professional preparation of specialists of socio-economic professions.
Tolerance is not just a tolerance for others' thoughts, beliefs and behaviour, it is a purposeful effort on the part of the individual to create an information space that promotes harmony, interpersonal cooperation, emotional tact and respect.
The empirical study involved 40 second-year students, including psychology students and foreign language teachers. The psychodiagnostic complex of methods presented in the article made it possible to obtain reliable research results. A comparative analysis of respondents' indicators showed that «tolerance» as a personal quality is significant for both groups. It is stated that psychology students are more tolerant of representatives of different social strata, while foreign language students are tolerant of ethnic minorities.
The study found that future psychologists seeking to assert their beliefs and considerations, if the situation becomes conflictual, can be harsh. Future teachers are more critical of themselves and their opinions, showing tact and understanding to manifest «paradoxical» actions, even if they do not agree with them.
The overall tolerance index of the two groups under study indicates that their behaviour and attitudes towards the world, people and events will depend on the particular social situation they are currently in.
References
Boiko, V. V. (1996). The energy of emotions in communication: a look at oneself and others. Moscow Filin information and publishing house.
Boluchevskaya, V. V. (2010). Professional self-determination of future professionals in assisting professions. Volgograd.
Burlakova, L. V. (2010). Determination of the class of socionomic professions. Practical psychology and social work, 7, 68-73.
Druzhynina, I. A. (2012). Research of the professional component in the structure of the identity of students in psychology major. Psychological perspectives, 19, 91-101.
Falko, N. M. (2009). Psychological bases of students’ internality formation in psychological and pedagogical majors at university. Science and education, 8, 176-180. https://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/doc/2009/8_2009/40.pdf.pdf
Gutu, V., & Boghian, I. (2019). A Bidimensional Psycho-pedagogical Model for Tolerance Education. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/153
Hryva, O. A. (2007). Tolerance in multicultural environment. Kyiv.
Isaev, V. P. (2013). Psychological peculiarities of the future professional activity of the specialists in socionomic field. The world of science, culture, education, 4(41), 203-206.
Kaverina, R. D. (1978). Psychological classification experience of some professions for professional consultation. Psychology questions, 2, 64-72.
Neizhpapa, L. S. (2015). Professional orientation of the future social pedagogue as a condition of his professional self-determination. Social work. Social pedagogy, 11, 79-86.
Onufriieva, L. A. (2012). Peculiarities of professional culture development of future specialists in socionomic professions as a goal of professional formation. Problems and prospects of formation of innovative system of education in the XXI century, 20-21.
Rogers, C. (1994). A look at the psychotherapy. Human development. Universal.
Shalin, V. V. (2002). Education and tolerance culture formation. Journal History, 11, 8-10.
Sikorska, L. B., Vovk, L. P., & Volotovska, Y. V. (2017). Psychological conditions of stress resistance of future specialists of the special education system. Young scientist, 5, 223-226. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/molv_2017_5_54
Skrypnyk, M. M. (2010). Theoretical approaches to the definition of the term “tolerance”. Problems of general and pedagogical psychology, 12(5), 306-309.
Soldatova, H. U., & Shaiherova L. A. (2003). Workshop on psychodiagnostics and tolerance research. Moscow.
Stefanenko, T. H. (1999). Ethnopsychology. Aspect-Press.
Tushkanova, O. (2002). How tolerant are you? // Tolerant consciousness and the formation of tolerant relations (theory and practice): collection of articles, 357-359.
Zeer, E. F. (2008). Psychology of the professional self-determination in early youth. Voronezh. MODEK.
Copyright (c) 2021 LUMEN Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© LUMEN Proceedings Series 2022 . The LUMEN Proceedings Open Access volumes are distributed under the terms of the 