Student-teachers' Experiences During Practicum in Pre-service Teacher Education in Myanmar
Abstract
Teacher education program differs internationally in accordance with the admission, assessment, teaching practice period, induction program, professional learning, initial teacher learning, continuous professional development, and performance appraisal systems for recognizing accredited teaching. Experts in teacher education recommends that the practicum is the focus and an integral part of initial teacher education program. In most countries, teacher education programs face difficulties in finding the proper role and form of practice. Referring to National Education Strategic Plan (2016-21) of Myanmar, practicum in teacher preparation program is dull and it has limited guidance and supervision. Moreover, very few publications are available in Myanmar that label the perceptions of teacher candidate on their practicum experience. This study explores student-teachers' experience during practicum in their pre-service teacher education program. The doctoral research will focus on the role of practicum in pre-service teacher education in Myanmar. This document describes the results of the pilot study conducted in 2019, July. The researcher employed convergent mixed-method design to collect data for the pilot study. Data collection methods include semi-structured focus group interviews and questionnaires. The final year student-teachers (N=23) who were enrolled in 2014 academic year at the Yangon University of Education are the subject of the study. The questionnaire consists of 27 closed items. Fourteen final-year student-teachers discussed their practicum experiences in two focus group interviews. Student-teachers' responses to the questionnaire are mostly positive. In the focus group interview, they mentioned their critical point of views such as their university program could prepare them to some extent for their practicum. There were some differences in responses to the questionnaire and focus group interviews. From the results of the quantitative and qualitative part, the researcher could learn some potential problem areas that can affect the whole doctoral research.
References
Agudo, M., J. (2016). What Type of feedback do Student-teachers expect from their School Mentors during Practicum Experience? The Case of Spanish EFL Student-teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 36-51. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol41/iss5/3
Ali, M. S., Othman, A. J., & Karim, A. F. A. (2013). Issues and Concerns Faced by Undergraduate Language Student-teachers during Teaching Practicum Experiences. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 2(3), 22-30. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086203.pdf
Al-Jaro, M., Asmawi, A., & Hasim, Z. (2017). Content Analysis of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the Curriculum of Yemeni EFL Teacher Education Programme. Arab World English Journal, 8(1), 264–279. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no1.19
Allen, J. M., & Wright, S. E. (2014). Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum. Teachers and Teaching, 20(2), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.848568
Arslan, Y. F., & Ilin, G. (2018). The Effects of Teaching Practicum on EFL Pre-Service Teachers' Concerns. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14 (2), 265-282. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1184382.pdf
Barton, G. M., Hartwig, K. A., & Cain, M. (2015). International students’ experience of practicum in teacher education: An exploration through internationalization and professional socialization. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), 149-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n8.9
Blair, E. (2015). A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 6(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.2458/v6i1.18772
Cairney, K., & Breen, A. V. (2017). Listening to https://doi.org/10.2458/v6i1.18772 their Lives: Learning through Narrative in an Undergraduate Practicum Course. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(3). http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol8/iss3/3
Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., Goh, K. C., & Ling Low, E. (2014). Practicum experience: Pre-service teachers’ self-perception of their professional growth. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51 (5), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.791552
Cortés, Y. A. (2016). Unveiling Pre-Service Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Teaching: The Role of Pedagogical Practicums. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18 (2), 47. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n2.49591
Cubero-Pérez, R., Cubero, M., & Bascón, M. J. (2019). The Reflective Practicum in the Process of Becoming a Teacher: The Tutor’s Discursive Support. Education Sciences, 9(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020096
Danner, R. B. (2014). Student Teachers' Perceptions of Sources of Teaching practice-related Anxieties. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(1), 47-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/jtte/020104
Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Recognizing and enhancing teacher effectiveness: A Policy Maker's Guide. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281996909_Recognizing_and_enhancing_teacher_effectiveness
Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education. Collier Books
Dias-Lacy, S. L., & Guirguis, R. V. (2017). Challenges for New Teachers and Ways of Coping with Them. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(3), 265. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n3p265
Edwards, A. (2001). Researching Pedagogy: A Sociocultural Agenda. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 9(2), 161–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360100200111
Gilliland, B., Tanaka, J., Schwartz, & Díez-Ortega, M. (2020). Multiple Dimensions of Teacher Development on an International Practicum. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 23(4), 225-245. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1242675.pdf
Guerriero, S. (Ed.). (2017). Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-en
Haydena, M. & Martin, R. (2013). Recovery of the Education System in Myanmar. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2(2), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.14425/00.50.28
Keser Ozmantar, Z. (2019). A Phenomenological Study of Practicum Experience: Preservice Teachers’ Fears. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.184.9
King, N. (1998). Template analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide (pp. 118–134). Sage Publications Ltd.
Kokkinos, C. M., Stavropoulos, G., & Davazoglou, A. (2016). Development of an instrument measuring student-teachers’ perceived stressors about the practicum. Teacher Development, 20(2), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1124139
Kopp, E. (2020). A pedagógusok folyamatos szakmai fejlődése és tanulása az oktatási rendszer szintjén [Teachers’ continuous professional development and learning at the level of education system]. Neveléstudomány, 1, 62-82. https://nevtud.ppk.elte.hu/dstore/document/3090/nevelestudomany_2020_1_62-82.pdf
Koşar, G. & Bedir, H. (2019). A comprehensive evaluation of practicum experience: From the view of pre-service EFL teachers. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 6(4). 1001-1016. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/724
Li, L. (2016). Factors of Practicum Experience for Pre-service Teacher's Sense of Readiness for Their Teaching Career [Master of Education Project, University of Victoria]. DSpace Library.https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/bitstream/handle/1828/7337/Li_Luhan_MEd_2016.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=4
Lucero, E., & Roncancio-Castellanos, K. (2019). The pedagogical practicum journey towards becoming an English language teacher. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 21(1), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile. v21n1.71300
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (2nd ed). Sage Publications.
Mostofo, J. (2018). Summer practicum partnership: impact on the efficacy of pre-service teachers. Journal of Instructional Research, 7, 40-54. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1188319.pdf
Murray-Harvey, R., T. Slee, P., Lawson, M. J., Silins, H., Banfield, G., & Russell, A. (2000). Under Stress: The concerns and coping strategies of teacher education students. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/713667267
Nkambule, T., & Mukeredzi, T. G. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ professional learning experiences during rural teaching practice in Acornhoek, Mpumalanga Province. South African Journal of Education, 37(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n3a1371
Qazi, W., & Rawat, K. J., Thomas, M. (2012). The Role of Practicum in Enhancing Student Teachers’ Teaching Skills. American Journal of Scientific Research, 44, 44–57. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Thomas-14/publication/324720990_The_Role_of_Practicum_in_Enhancing_Student_Teachers'_Teaching_Skills/links/5adefb81458515c60f618756/The-Role-of-Practicum-in-Enhancing-Student-Teachers-Teaching-Skills.pdf
Selçuk, M., & Yöntem, E. G. (2019). Beyond Practicum: Interplay between Prospective EFL Teachers' Conceptualizations of Field Experience and Teaching Career. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(1), 154. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.1p.154
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004
Smith, K., & Lev‐Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre-service teacher education: The voice of the students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660500286333
Sulistiyo, U., Mukminin, A., Abdurrahman, K., & Haryanto, E. (2017). Learning to Teach: A Case Study of Student Teachers’ Practicum and Policy Recommendations. The Qualitative Report, 22(3), 712-731. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2671
Swennen, A., & van der Klink, M. (Eds.). (2009). Becoming a Teacher Educator. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8874-2
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE.
Teng, (2017). Emotional Development and Construction of Teacher Identity: Narrative Interactions about the Pre-service Teachers’ Practicum Experiences. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(11), 117-143. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1161164.pdf
The Government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar Ministry of Education (2016). National Education Strategic Plan - NESP (2016-21). https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/myanmar_national_education_strategic_plan_2016-21.pdf
Tuli, F., & File, G. (2010). Practicum Experience in Teacher Education. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 5(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesc.v5i1.56316
Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived Problems of Beginning Teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54 (2), 143–178. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054002143
Volk, D. (1997). Questions in Lessons: Activity Settings in the Homes and School of Two Puerto Rican Kindergartners. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 28, 22-49.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.).Sage Publications.
Zeichner, K. (1986). The practicum as an occasion for learning to teach. The South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 14(2), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0311213860140202
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the Connections Between Campus Courses and Field Experiences in College- and University-Based Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671
Copyright (c) 2021 LUMEN Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© LUMEN Proceedings Series 2022 . The LUMEN Proceedings Open Access volumes are distributed under the terms of the 