Psychological Features of Manifestation of Coping-Resources of Schoolteachers
The article is devoted to the psychological peculiarities of the manifestation of coping-resources of educators. The teaching profession belongs to the category of professions especially vulnerable to stress, since the teacher has to solve various professional tasks in the absence of time and information, constant open contact with people, which entails considerable emotional energy. The professional activity of a modern teacher requires constant and maximum mobilization of their personal resources. Maintaining or enhancing a person's stress resistance is associated with finding and using resources well enough to help the educator overcome the negative effects of stressful situations.
The article reveals such characteristics of personality and social environment that facilitate or make possible adaptation to life stresses, promotes the development of a means of overcoming it, and increases stress resistance. These personal structures help a person cope with threatening circumstances and facilitate adaptation.
The author analyzes the scientific and psychological approaches to understand personal resources, determinants of the choice of coping-strategies, and the influence of the characteristics of professional activity on the behavior of the individual. Questions about structure, functions, and types of coping behavior are raised. According to the majority of modern researchers, the generalized classification of the methods of mastering stressful circumstances is analyzed: coping aimed at evaluation; problem-oriented coping; coping aimed at emotions. Also presented were the most up-to-date and most modern models of coping resources, which can be viewed from different angles to look at the choice of coping-resources by the personality of the teacher, taking into account the conditions of his professional activity.
The organization and methods of conducted research of the features of manifestation of coping-resources in teachers are described. The presented quantitative and qualitative results are disclosed according to the stages of the study. In particular, the analysis of teacher’s coping-strategies depending on the level of emotional burnout, ways of overcoming difficult life situations, as well as the methods of coping-behavior of the respondents. Relationships between teachers' coping-resources and emotional and mental stress as well as the monotony of professional activities are also identified. Adaptive and non-adaptive coping behaviors are differentiated in terms of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral coping strategies are analyzed separately.
Based on the theoretical analysis of the scientific literature and empirical research, the author substantiates the relevant conclusions and recommendations for school educators on the effective use of their own coping resources.
Aldwin, C. (1994). Stress, coping and development: An integrative perspective. Guilford Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundation of Thought and Action: A social-cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Conway, V. J., & Terry, D. J. (1992). Appraised Controllability as a Moderator of the Effectiveness of Different Coping Strategies: A Test of the Goodness of Fit Hypothesis. Austral. J. Psychol, 44(1), 1-7.
Haan N. The adolescent antecedents of an ego model of coping and defense and comparisons with Q-sorted ideal personalities / N. Haan // Genet. Psychol. Monogr. – 1974. – Vol. 89, N 2. – P.274-306.
Heim, E. (1988). Coping und Adaptivitat: Gibt es geeignetes oder ungeeignetes Coping. Psychother. med.
Kryukov, T. L. (2005). Age and cross-cultural differences in coping strategies. Psychological journal, 2, 5-16.
Kryukov, T. L. (2007). Methodology of research and adaptation of the questionnaire for diagnosing coping (copying) behavior. Journal of Practical Psychologist, 3, 82-92.
Kryukova, T. L., Kuftyak, E. V., M. Zamyshlyaeva (2007). Questionnaire of coping methods (adaptation of WCQ methodology). Journal of the practical psychologist, 3, 93- 112.
Lazarus, R. (1998). Theory of stress and psychophysiological research. Emotional stress. In L. Levy (Ed.). pp. 178-208.
Lazarus, R. S. & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European journal of personality, 1, 141-169.
Lazarus, R. S. (1996). Psychological stress and the coping process. Mc-Graw Hill. 4. p. 29.
Maslach K, Jackson S. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout // Journal of Occupational Behavior. Vol.2. P. 99-113
Park, C. L., Folkman, S., & Bostrom, A. (2001). Appraisals of controllability and coping in caregivers and HIV+men: Testing the gooodnes-fit hypothesis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 481–488.
Schaefer, C., Coyne, J. C., Lazarus, R. S. (1981). The health-rated functions of social support. Journal of Behavior Medicine, 4, 381-406.
Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., & Ellis, A. P. (1994). Coping amomg emotional approach: Problems of conceptualization and confounding. J of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 350-362. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35184.108.40.2060
Vodopyanova, N. E. (2009). Psychodiagnosis of stress. Peter. 336 p.
Vodopyanova, N. E., & Starchenkova, E. S. (2008). Burnout syndrome: diagnosis and prevention. Peter. 300 p.
Weber, H. (1992). Belastungsverarbeitung. Klinische Psychologie, 21, 1, 17-27.
Wills, T. A. & Shiffman, S. (1985). Coping and substance use: A conceptual structure. In S. Shiffman, & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Coping and Substance use. Academic Press. 3-25.
Copyright (c) 2021 LUMEN Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.