Conditions and Characteristics of the Repairable Injury
Abstract
According to the Civil Code, the right to reparation arises from causing the injury, when the right to an action is born to obtain the prejudice redress, but we have some reservations, both in terms of prescribing the right to action and terminology.Thus, we consider that the practical use of the right to reparation will be possible after the procedures provided by the law, when the claim becomes cert, liquid and eligible, provided that the court decision has the constitutive character of rights.The solution to assess the injury at the time of its occurrence is unfair to the victim because it refers to the assessment of the injury or the value of the injury can exponentially increase with the period between the moment of the injury and the moment of the decision to repair. The solution for a more effective protection of the victim would be the assessment of injuries in relation to the date of the judgment, the most frequent argument being made in the case of the personal injury with priority regarding the physical and moral integrity of the person, the Romanian Civil Code regulation being derogatory to common law. The victim’s right to claim is born at the time of the injury, but at this point is an abstract prejudice, being an imperfect right. In this respect, the French doctrine is divided, some considering the “information claim” at the time of the injury, and others claiming the thesis of the declarative nature of the decision ordering injuries. If we take into account the realities we are confronted with, we cannot see that there may be changes in the extent of the injury caused to the victim even during the trial, especially as a cause that can last for many years. We also believe that it would be appropriate to extend civil liability assumptions to the limit of insurable activities, victims being fairly protected, both by committing civil liability and by triggering the insurance contract mechanism.
References
[2] Parlamentul României, Codul Civil, Art 1359 Repararea prejudiciului constând în vătămarea unui interes. 2009 (Text republicat în Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr. 505 din 15 iulie 2011) [Romanian Parliament, Civil Code, Art 1359 Reparation of the damage consisting in the damage of an interest. 2009 (Text republished in the Official Gazette, Part I no. 505 of July 15, 2011)]
[3] Parlamentul României, Codul de procedură civilă din 2010, Art. 32 Condiții de exercitare a acțiunii civile, Monitorul Oficial, 2010 [Romanian Parliament, Civil Procedure Code of 2010, Art. 32 Conditions for exercising civil action, Official Gazette, 2010]
[4] Republicques Francaise, Code de procédure civile, Article 31, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI000006410125&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070716&dateTexte=19760101
[5] The principles of European civil liability law qualify the legitimacy of the damage in art. 2: 103 as a condition of civil liability
[6] S. Neculaescu s.a., Instituţii de drept civil, Ed. Universul Juridic, Bucureşti, 2013, p. 270
[7] X. Pradel, Le prejudice dans le droit civil de la responsabilitè, L.G.D.J., p.237.
[8] L. Pop, I.F., Popa, S. I., Vidu, Curs de drept civil. Obligaţiile, Ed. Universul Juridic, Bucureşti, 2015, p. 415
[9] M. Eliescu, Răspunderea civilă delictuală, Ed. Academia Română, Bucureşti, 1972 p. 92
[10] Dogaru I, Drăghici P. Drept civil: teoria generală a obligaţiilor în reglementarea NCC:[curs universitar]. CH Beck; 2014.
[11] D. Barbu, Some Aspects Concerning the Civil Action in the Criminal Proceedings, Sandu, A; Ciulei, T; Frunza, A., Book Series: European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 15, pp. 95-101, 2016
[12] Terrè Fr, Dimler Ph., & Lequette Jv., Droit civil. Les obligations, Dalloz. 2005. p. 664
[13] Cass crim, 23 fèvrier 1977. Bull. Crim nr. 73. p. 169
[14] D. Barbu, Drept procesual penal. Partea generala. Iasi: Ed. Lumen. 2016. p.102
[15] V. Stoica, Relaţia cauzală complexă ca element al răspunderii civile delictuale în procesul penal, in R.R.D. No. 2/ 1984. p. 35
[16] Albu I. Repararea prejudiciului cauzat prin vătămări corporale. Ed. Bucureşti. 1997. pp. 53-54
[17] Popescu C. F. Determinarea şi evaluarea prejudiciilor corporale, Caransebeş: Ed. Dalami. 2005. pp. 172- 192
[18] Parlamentul României, Codul Civil, Art. 1390-1392, 2009 (Text republicat în Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr. 505 din 15 iulie 2011) [Romanian Parliament, Civil Code, Art. 1390-1392, 2009 (Text republished in the Official Gazette, Part I no. 505 of July 15, 2011)]
[19] C. Stătescu, C.Bîrsan, Drept civil. Teoria generală a obligaţiilor, ediţia a IX-a, Ed. Hamangiu, Bucureşti, 2008, p. 147
[20] L. Pop, Tratat de drept civil. Obligaţiile. Vol. al II-lea. Contractul, Ed. Universul Juridic, Bucureşti, 2009, p.654. pp. 202-203
[21] D. Barbu, & A. Petrea, Drept procesual penal. Partea generala. Caiet de seminar, Ed. Lumen, Iasi. 2016. p. 95-97
[22] Parlamentul României, Codul Civil, Art. 1.385 alin. (1), 2009 (Text republicat în Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr. 505 din 15 iulie 2011) [Romanian Parliament, Civil Code, Art. 1.385 alin. (1), 2009 (Text republished in the Official Gazette, Part I no. 505 of July 15, 2011)]
[23] S. Neculaescu, Răspunderea civilă delictuală. Examen critic al condiţiilor şi fundamentării răspunderii civile delictuale în dreptul civil român, Ed. Şansa, Bucureşti, 1994, p.273
Copyright (c) 2018 LUMEN Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© LUMEN Proceedings Series 2022 . The LUMEN Proceedings Open Access volumes are distributed under the terms of the 