Ethics and Responsibility in the Collection System of Local Taxes and Fees

  • Dorina Sandu Valahia University, Târgovişte, România
Keywords: Local public institutions, administration reform, taxpayer, public practices, public services, public management, integrity, professional ethics, responsibility

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to highlight the perception of ethics and responsibility as fundamental values in the activity of public institutions. Another aspect to be clarified is the degree to which taxpayers, through their adopted attitude, are prepared or want to actively participate in consolidating a transparent, responsible, and efficient administrative act, adapted to the new fiscal-budgetary and socio-economic changes. The orientation towards this attitude was determined especially through by my own professional activity and by the particularly important goal of the administration reform - to bring the citizen - taxpayer as close as possible to the public institution and to the services that the institution provides. After more than 10 years of professional experience in this field, I can say that informing the citizen is not enough. It is predominating the notifications regarding payment obligations and tax compliance. Any taxpayer has equal obligations and rights. First of all, I am referring to the right to request and receive the necessary information, then to the right to be heard and assisted. Another important right is to pay the correct amount of established taxes and fees. Adding the right to file complaints against the administrative acts and far too often changings tax legislation, this can put pressure on the civil servant. Cultivating the ethical attitude, the morale and professional responsibility, this will determine optimal choices, decisions and actions. At the same time, the citizen must not be a spectator, but a co-actor of the process of achieving the highest possible ethical standards at the level of these services and public institutions in general, by reporting the situations of violation of ethical norms and by refraining from encouraging unethical behaviors. There is more in the ethical and responsible behavior of the civil servant than the duties in the job description. We are talking in this case about a particularly important concept, about social responsibilities.

References

Grigorescu A. Marketing of Public and Business Affairs Subsystems of Socio-Economic Environment. Contemporary Economics 2008; 2: 87-99.

Grigorescu A. Quality and customer satisfaction in public services. Economic Amphitheater 2008; 1: 130-135.

Matei O. Ethical legislation in the Romanian public administration. Journal of Public Administration and Social Policies 2010; II (4 (5): 80-97.

Rădulescu C. Deontology of the civil service. University Publishing House: Bucharest; 2016.

Stănciulescu D., Sandu A.M. Considerations regarding the ethical responsibility of civil servants. Universul Juridic Magazine 2018; 9: 116-122

Tomescu M. Deontology of the civil servant. Pro University: Bucharest; 2012.

Vedinaş V. Law no. 188/1999 on the status of civil servants. Comments. Legislation. Doctrine. Jurisprudence. Legal Universe: Bucharest; 2009.

The Government of Romania. E.G.O. no. 43 regarding the National Anticorruption Prosecutor's Office. Published in O.M. no. 244 / 11.04.2002.

The Government of Romania. E.G.O. no. 57 regarding the Administrative Code. Published in O.M. no. 555 / 05.07.2019.

The Government of Romania. G.D. no. 114 regarding the updating of the National Program for Romania's accession to the European Union. Published in O.M. no. 98 / 08.03.1999.

The Government of Romania. G.D. no. 1000 on the organization and functioning of the National Agency of Civil Servants. Published in O.M. no. 620/ 02.09.2010.

The Government of Romania. G.D. no. 909 regarding the approval of the Strategy for the consolidation of the public administration 2014-2020 and the establishment of the National Committee for the coordination of the implementation of the Strategy for the consolidation of the public administration. Published in O.M. no. 834 / 17.112014.

The Romanian Parliament. Law no. 115 on the declaration and control of the assets of dignitaries, magistrates, civil servants and of persons with management positions. Published in O.M. no. 263/263 / 28.10.1996.

The Romanian Parliament. Law no. 188 on the status of civil servants. Published in O.M. no. 600 / 08.12.1999.

The Romanian Parliament. Law no. 78 for the prevention, discovery, and sanctioning of corruption. Published in O.M. no. 219 / 18.05.2000.

The Romanian Parliament. Law no. 161 on some measures to ensure transparency in the exercise of public dignity, public office and in the business environment, the prevention and sanctioning of corruption. Published in O.M. no. 279 / 21.04.2003.

The Romanian Parliament. Law no. 50 for the amendment and completion of Law no. 7/2004 on the Code of Conduct for Civil Servants. Published in O.M. no. 194 / 21.03.2007).

The Romanian Parliament. Law no. 7 regarding the Code of Conduct of civil servants. Published in O.M. no. 525 / 02.08.2007.

The Romanian Parliament. Law no. 144 on the establishment, organization and functioning of the National Integrity Agency. Published in O.M. no. 535/03.08.2007.

National Agency for Fiscal Administration. Code of ethics of the civil servant in the fiscal administration who carries out his activity in the field of taxpayer assistance. [Online]. Available from: https://static.anaf.ro/static/10/Anaf/Prezentare_R/Cod_etic_functionar.htm. [Accessed: 19.04.2020]

The Mayor of Luduș City Hall. Disposition no. 631/02.10.2019 regarding the approval of the Code of ethics and integrity of civil servants and contract staff within the City Hall of Luduş. [Online]. Available at: http://www.ludus.ro/portal/mures/ludus/portal.nsf/99621933D1A7D144C2258489003070CC/$FILE/CodEtic.pdf. [Accessed: 19.04.2020].

Published
2020-07-13
How to Cite
Sandu, D. (2020). Ethics and Responsibility in the Collection System of Local Taxes and Fees. LUMEN Proceedings, 11, 129-140. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/gekos2020/14