Measuring the Level of Ethics within the Project Team

  • Andreea Mocanu Valahia University, Targoviste, Romania
Keywords: Ethics, Workplace, Project Management, Team, Assessment

Abstract

The subject of Ethics has been of interest for centuries, especially for philosophers and theologians, and it has impacted all aspects of human life since its beginnings. Today more than ever ethical behavior is essential in the business world and it is of focus in all organizations, even in the temporary, project based ones. "Measuring the Level of Ethics within the Project Team” is an article that addresses the need to assess the level of ethics of any and every project team, by testing the applicability of a previously designed instrument. The tool was created with the help of a group of ethic professionals from the Project Management field through a focus group. The resulting questionnaire consists of a series of statements, considering the areas of project organization, team communication and team development, out of the total of 79 resulted affirmations. To validate the applicability of this kind of assessment, 28 questions were selected and previously applied in an outsourcing multinational company with over 2000 employees in Bucharest only; more specifically in the Purchasing Department for client X, where there were several ongoing projects. In accordance to specialty literature, several basic ethical values were especially tested: responsibility, respect, honesty, fairness. Considering the premise of this research is that this instrument is suited for any kind of project team, this paper’s main objective is to test if there is a correlation between the questionnaire positive results and the existence of at least one of the six ethical conduct elements. Consequently, the hypothesis is that the results of the questionnaire will be influenced by the existence of one or more of the components: code of conduct, trainings, advice, evaluation, reporting and disciplinary systems. To test it, 33 project teams were asked to take the questionnaire, and their responses were correlated positively, negatively or neutral to the companies’ concern for business ethics norms.

References

Bouley J. Standing on Principle: PMI unveils a revised code of ethics to meet the needs of a global profession. Modern Ethic. A Supplement to PM Network. 2007, January.

ERC. National Business Ethics Survey of the US Workforce. NBES; 2013. Available from: http://lowellmilkeninstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Thomas-Jordan_Ethics-Resource-Center-National-Business-Ethics-of-the-U.S.-Workplace.pdf

Grigorescu A. Practica managementului proiectelor. Bucharest: Uranus; 2009.

Grigorescu A, Maer-Matei MM., Mocanu C, Zamfir, A-M. Key Drivers and Skills Needed for Innovative Companies Focused on Sustainability. Sustainability. 2020; 12 (1), 102 p.

Grigorescu A. Models of public – private partnership projects in tourism industry. Tourism & Hospitality Industry 2008. New trends in Tourism and Hospitality Management.2008. Vol. ISBN 9 No. Rijeka, Croaţia: Fintrade & Tours d.o.o.; 2018: 487-497.

Grover D. Ethical Issues in Project Management and How To Deal with Them. PM; 2016. Available from: https://project-management.com/ethical-issues-in-project-management-and-how-to-deal-with-them/

J.D. Brady. Reinventing Civic Engagement: A Conversation With Carol Coletta. TCF; 2015. Available from: https://casefoundation.org/blog/millennial-civic-engagement/

Project Management Institute. Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct; 2007. Available from: https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/ethics/pmi-code-of-ethics.pdf?v=5b0f0983-6467-4d7d-9aae-577fbac4d4b3&sc_lang_temp=en

Schweriner, J.H..Ethics Considerations for the Project Manager in Professional Services. PMI-GCP; 2007

Shouche S. Ethical project management. PMI® Global Congress 2008-Asia Pacific, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute; 2008.

Published
2020-07-13
How to Cite
Mocanu, A. (2020). Measuring the Level of Ethics within the Project Team. LUMEN Proceedings, 11, 192-202. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/gekos2020/20