Homo Pulsator, or an Outline for a Phenomenology of Beating

  • Ivan IVLAMPIE Professor PhD, “Dunarea de Jos” University Galati, Galati, Romania
Keywords: homo pulsator, human behaviour, institution, education, punishment

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate a behaviour which, along with many others, is decisive in understanding human nature. Together with zoon politicon, homo homini lupus, homo faber and homo ludens, which describe trajectories of the human destiny, homo pulsator or the human being beating or bullying another human may be equally invoked as relevant in this respect. In this study, we provide a phenomenological description of this strange human behaviour; this is not a sociological perspective (which can allow us to analyse the phenomenon only as a form of anomie), nor a psychological or anthropological approach (directions that open up an interpretation starting from the decisive thesis of our aggressive nature), but a cultural perspective: beating as a cultural institution. What does this perspective mean? To understand this behaviour as one consciously set. From the perspective of Aristotelian determinism, the phenomenology of beating cannot be understood without its final causality. What is the purpose of school beating, as encouraged by the great humanist thinkers? Or of beating as a form of public punishment or as a means of torture? By asking and answering such questions, we sketch the main lines of the phenomenology of this bizarre behaviour of human beings.

References

[1] Aristotle. Politics. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company; 1998. 288 p.
[2] Descartes R.. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. Fourth Edition. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company; 1998. 103 p.
[3] Bergson H. Creative Evolution. New York: The Modern Library; 1944. 453 p.
[4] Huizinga H. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1949. 220 p.
[5] Plautus. Asinaria: The One about the Asses. Madison WI: The University of Wisconsin Press; 2006. 252 p.;
[6] Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. 508 p.
[7] Laertius D. Despre vieţile şi doctrinele filosofilor [The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers]. Iaşi: Polirom Publishing; 1997. 624 p.
[8] Mauss M. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Translated by Ian Cunnison. London: Cohen & West Ltd; 1966. 130 p.
[9] Frazer JG. The Golden Bough. A Study of Magic and Religion. Digitized by Temple of Earth Publishing. 1922. Available from http://www.templeofearth.com/books/goldenbough.pdf.
[10] Nietzsche F. The Genealogy of Morality. Translated by Carol Diethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. 195 p.
[11] Locke J. Thoughts concerning Education. The Federalist Papers Project. Available from http://thefederalistpapers.integratedmarket.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/John-Locke-Thoughts-Concerning-Education.pdf.
[12] Périer G. Viaţa domnului Pascal scrisă de sora lui, doamna Périer [The Life of Mr Paschal, with His Letters Related to the Jesuits]. In: Pascal. Cugetări. Oradea: AION Publishing; 1998. 57 p.
Published
2017-08-18
How to Cite
IVLAMPIE, I. (2017). Homo Pulsator, or an Outline for a Phenomenology of Beating. LUMEN Proceedings, 1, 364-374. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.rsacvp2017.33