A Few Considerations Concerning Latin And Slavic Influences On The Development Of Noun Inflection In Contemporary Romanian

  • Cipriana-Elena PEICA Assistant Lecturer, Faculty of Letters, Babeş–Bolyai University of Cluj–Napoca, Romania
Keywords: noun, Roman, Balkan, Latin, inflection


The Romanian language is the representative of the Latin language spoken continuously from the time of the Roman rule in the Eastern Roman Empire until today. Latin has changed, has evolved under the influence of the native populations of Dacia and the Balkan Peninsula or of the populations coming from other regions and settled in the Danube regions. All these changes are reflected in texts showing that vulgar or spoken Latin underlying the Romanian language is not different from the Latin spoken in other Roman provinces. The evolution of Latin is reflected in all areas of grammar, from the phonological system to the morphological and syntactic system. In this paper, we will focus on the influences of Latin and Slavic languages on noun inflection in Romanian; we will also focus on the reversed situation, namely on how the particularities of the Romanian language influenced, in turn, Slavic languages such as Bulgarian. Therefore, we will address two linguistic systems that are different, but which are interlinked and mutually influenced. We will refer to analytical declension, synthetic declension, articulated and non-articulated forms of nouns, and prepositions, in a desire to present a few particularities of the two linguistic systems that explain how Latin and Slavic influences are reflected in noun inflection in contemporary Romanian.


[1] Coteanu I. Morfologia numelui în limba română (româna comună) [Morphology of the name in Romanian (common Romanian)]. București: Editura Academiei; 1969. 11 p.
[2] Densusianu, Ovid. Istoria limbii române [History of Romanian]. vol. I-II. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei; 1961. p. 40.
[3] Dimitriu C. Tratat de gramatică a limbii române [Grammar of the Romanian Language]. Iaşi: Institutul European; 2000. pp. 132–135.
[4] Klimkowski T. Paralele între limbile balcanoromanice şi balcanoslave în flexiunea substantivului [Parallels Between Balkano-romanian and Balkan Languages in the Flexion of the Noun]. Philologica Jassyensia. 2012; 2 (16): 223–233.
[5] Iordan I, Guţu Romalo V, Niculescu A. Structura morfologică a limbii române contemporane [The Morphological Structure of the Contemporary Romanian Language]. Bucharest: Scientific Publishing House; 1967. 276-281p.
[6] Pătruţ I. Despre genul neutru în limba română [About Neutral Gender in Romanian]. Cluj-Napoca: CL, I, 1956. 29-34 p.
[7] Pătruţ I. Despre genul substantivelor româneşti de origine slavă [About the Kind of Romanian Nouns with Slavic Origin]. Cluj-Napoca: CL, I, 1961. 95-100 p.
[8] Rosetti. Al. Istoria limbii române, I, De la origini pînă la începutul secolului al XVII-lea [History of the Romanian Language, I, From the Origins until the Beginning of the 17th Century]. Ediţie definitivă. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste Romînia; 1986. 585 p.
[9] Stati S. Din problemele istoriei declinării româneşti [From the Problems of the History of the Romanian Decline]. Revista SCL. 1959; 1 (X): 63-75 p.
[10] Seidel E. Elemente sintactice slave în limba română [Slavic Syntactic Elements in Romanian]. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Române; 1958. 15-16, 21p.
How to Cite
PEICA, C.-E. (2017). A Few Considerations Concerning Latin And Slavic Influences On The Development Of Noun Inflection In Contemporary Romanian. LUMEN Proceedings, 1, 578-586. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.rsacvp2017.52