The Institutions of Public Administration of Child’s Protection of the Republic of Moldova

  • Andrei SMOCHINĂ Habilitated Doctor in Legal Sciences, Professor. Free University of Moldova, Chişinău, The Republic of Moldova
  • Tatiana FOCŞA PhD student in Law, Master in Public Law, Chisinau, Pedagogical State University “Ion Creangă”, Chişinău, The Republic of Moldova
Keywords: institution, state administration, protection, safety, child, best interest

Abstract

The state has a fundamental responsibility towards the destiny of every citizen, especially towards the children that represent the future of the country. The state contribution to the activity of child protection is manifested by guaranteeing the functioning of institutions, services and public or private structures which are responsible for child care and protection. Social protection of people in general and of children in particular represents the key-element of the social reforms and the main direction of the state social policy. As social activity, the public administration fulfills the general interest expressed within the law, accordingly being the activity that organizes and enforces the law till the concrete material fact. The public authorities intervene every time when the child’s development, safety or physical and moral integrity are endangered. The research issue consists in determining the institutions of public administration of child’s protection and analyzing the competences of these institutions regulated in the European acts, in the normative acts of the Republic of Moldova and in many other acts that are subordinated to the law. The analysis of the national judicial practice shows that in all cases which are related directly or indirectly to the best interest of the child, the presence of the guardianship authority is mandatory. The best interest of the child is the principle that represents the supreme concern in the judicial and extrajudicial procedures with children involvement. Thus, all regulations approved in the field of respecting and promoting the child’s rights, as well as any legal act issued or, according to case, concluded within the mentioned field are subordinated with priority to the principle of the best interest of the child. Thus, by the given investigation, the authors tend to reveal which of public authorities is involved in the protection of child’s rights, as well as to analyze the practices of the European states regarding the subject under discussion

References

[1] Declaration of the rights of the child, Proclaimed by General Assembly Resolution 1386(XIV) of 20 November 1959.
[2] ONU Convention regarding the Child’s Rights, adopted by the General Assembly of the Organization of United Nations at 20.11.1989. Ratified by the Republic of Moldova by the Parliament Decision Nr.408 of 12.12.1990. In: Official Monitor of the Republic of Moldova, 30.12.1990, nr.12.
[3] African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child. OUA Addis Abeba, 1990 [online]. Available from: www.unsystem.org
[4] European Convention on the Exercise of Children's Rights, Strasbourg, 25/01/1996 - Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non-member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non-member States and by the European Union
[5] Iorgovan A. Treaty of Administrative Law. Bucharest: All Beck, 2005. 650 p.
[6] Manda C. Administrative Law. Bucharest: Lumina Lex, 2001, 511 p.
[7] Mărgineanu L. The role of public administration in solving the issues of children left without the parental defense. National Journal of Law. 2007; 7:69-77.
[8] Rapotan A. The child’s protection through the involvement of central public administration. National Journal of Law. 2009; 8:32-37.
[9] Neacşu S., Mărgineanu L. Some theoretical aspects regarding the objectives of the public administration. Journal of University Juridical Studies. 2011; 1-2:311-314.
[10] Guţuleac V. Administrative Law. Chişinău: S. n. (Central Printing House), 2013. 600 p.
[11] Ciucă A. The best interest of the child. New meanings of a “magic formula” [Internet]. IDEO, Romanian Journal of Philosophical and Social Studies. 2017; 2(1):3-10. Available from: http://ideo.acadiasi.ro/site/default/files/ papers/Ideo-2017-1-08.pdf
[12] Ciucă A. L’intérêt de l’enfant à naître versus le droit à l’identité de la personne. New Journal of human rights. 2012; 4:3-11.
[13] Ciucă A. Actual problems of the political-legal space of the E.U. (Probleme actuale ale spațiului politico-juridic al U.E). Supplement to the Romanian Journal of the European Law. 2016; p. 37-45.
[14] The Law regarding the special protection of the children in risk situations and children separated from parents (Legea privind protecţia specială a copiilor aflaţi în situaţie de risc şi a copiilor separaţi de părinţi) Nr. 140 of 14.06.2013. In: Official Monitor of the Republic of Moldova, 02.08.2013, nr. 167-172.
[15] The Government Decision nr 7. Of 20.01.2016 regarding the approval of Regulation-framework related to the organization and functioning of the Commission for the protection of the child in difficulty. (Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 7 din 20.01.2016 cu privire la aprobarea Regulamentului-cadru privind organizarea şi funcţionarea Comisiei pentru protecţia copilului aflat în dificultate) In: Official Monitor of the Republic of Moldova of 22.01.2016, nr. 13-19.
[16] Cebotari V. Taking the child from parents – a sanction or a measure of protection of the minor? (Luarea copilului de la părinţi – sancţiune sau măsură de protecţie a minorului?). Studia Universitatis Moldavie. 2016; 11:184-186.
[17] Miron O. Legal instruments of international private law in the domain of protecting the child’s rights. (Instrumente juridice de drept internaţional privat în domeniul protecţiei drepturilor copilului.). Studia Universitatis Moldavie. 2016; 11:187-194.
Published
2017-08-18
How to Cite
SMOCHINĂ, A., & FOCŞA, T. (2017). The Institutions of Public Administration of Child’s Protection of the Republic of Moldova. LUMEN Proceedings, 1, 832-844. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.rsacvp2017.76