Romanian Forest Sector Labor Force - Evolutions and Trends

  • Laurenţiu Ciornei Center for Study and Research for AgroForestry Biodiversity “Acad. David Davidescu”, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania
  • Paula Munteanu School of Advanced Studies of the Romanian Academy (SCOSAAR), Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania
Keywords: Forest sector, sustainable development, labor force, new technologies

Abstract

As a trend of evolution, the labor force in the Romanian forestry sector is part of trajectory registered by the European Union, as a whole, because many of the member countries are still oriented on the traditional methods of administration, harvesting and processing. However, there are also developed countries with large forested areas (Finland, Sweden) that have embraced new technologies and adjusted management and production processes. This issue aimed, among other things, at reducing the number of people employed in the forestry sector.

In Romania, increasing the number of the employees, based on the quantitative increase of jobs as result of the gross exploitation of resources, will slow down by adopting new technologies, reducing the consumption of natural resources, but also as an effect of economic shocks generated by the pandemic. For these reasons, according to our study, the low-skilled workforce will suffer, this being the most vulnerable category, as technological developments need employees with higher skills and abilities. Equally, the informal sector must be taken into account because it employs four times people more.

Romania have to adopt those appropriate measures in order to help the incorporation of the labor force released from the forestry sector of resource exploitation into adjacent sustainable activities.

Author Biographies

Laurenţiu Ciornei, Center for Study and Research for AgroForestry Biodiversity “Acad. David Davidescu”, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania

Center for Study and Research for AgroForestry Biodiversity “Acad. David Davidescu”, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania

Paula Munteanu, School of Advanced Studies of the Romanian Academy (SCOSAAR), Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania

School of Advanced Studies of the Romanian Academy (SCOSAAR), Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania

References

Andersson E, Lidestav G. (2014). Gendered resource access and utilisation in swedish family farming. Land. 2014;3:188–203. https://doi.org/10.3390/land3010188

Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, Belcher B, Hogarth NJ, Bauch S, Börner J, Smith-Hall C, Wunder S. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Development. 2014;64:S12–S28.

FAO. State of the World’s Forests [Internet]. 2014. Rome. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3710e.pdf

FAO. State of the World’s Forests [Internet]. 2018. Rome. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/I9535EN/i9535en.pdf

FAO. State of the World’s Forests [Internet]. 2020. Rome. Available from: http://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/2020

Forest Europe. Home page [online]. 2019. Zvolen, Slovakia.

Garnett ST, Burgess ND, Fa JE, Fernández-Llamazares Á, Molnár Z, Robinson CJ, Watson JE. et al. A spatial overview of the global importance of indigenous lands for conservation. Nature Sustainability. 2018;1(7):369–374.

Hegetschweiler KT, de Vries S, Arnberger A, Bell S, Brennan M, Siter N, Olafsson AS, Voigt A, Hunziker M. Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: A review of European studies. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. 2017;21:48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.002

Hoare A. Tackling illegal logging and the related trade: what progress and where next? Chatham House Report. London: Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs; 2015.

Mörald E, Sandstrom C, Nordin A. Forest, Governance and Management Across Time. Developing a new social contract. London/New York: Routledge; 2017

Nellemann C, Henriksen R, Kreilhuber A, Stewart D, Kotsovou M, Raxter P, Mrema E, Barrat S. (eds.). The rise of environmental crime: A growing threat to natural resources peace, development and security. Nairobi, UNEP, and Oslo: Norwegian Center for Global Analyses (RHIPTO); 2016.

Newton P, Miller DC, Byenkya MAA, Agrawal A. Who are forest-dependent people? A taxonomy to aid livelihood and land use decision-making in forested regions. Land Use Policy. 2016;57:388–395.

Paumgarten F, Locatelli B, Witkowski ETF. Wild foods: safety net or poverty trap? A South African case study. Human Ecology. 2018;46(2):183–195.

Pülzl H, Kleinschmit D, Arts B. Bioeconomy – an emerging meta-discourse affecting forest discourses? Scand. J. Forest Res. 2014;29:386–393. https://doi.org/10. 1080/02827581.2014.920044.

Romsilva, Buget si situatii financiare [Internet]. 2010-20019, Available from: http://www.rosilva.ro/rnp/buget_si_situatii_financiare__p_55.htm

Published
2020-12-17
How to Cite
Ciornei, L., & Munteanu, P. (2020). Romanian Forest Sector Labor Force - Evolutions and Trends. LUMEN Proceedings, 14, 436-449. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/ibmage2020/32