Communication and Language Learning in Virtual Environments through an Eco-semiotic Lens

  • Alina Andreea Dragoescu Urlica Lecturer, Banat’s USAMVB University “King Michael I of Romania”
  • Lulzime Kamberi Assoc. Prof., Univ. of Tetovo
  • Marta Boguslawska-Tafelska Assist. Prof., Łomza State University of Applied Sciences
Keywords: Eco-semiotics, sustainable communication, digital literacy, language learning, virtual environments


The paper explores the interface between the new theoretical approach of ecolinguistics and language educational practices in the new digital environments that we have plunged into during 2020-2021. From the standpoint of ecological communication and eco-semiotics, the exploration highlights its impact on language learning and education in general, as re-contextualized in the new digital spaces we have all been experiencing as educators and learners. The theoretical input from semiotics and conceptual linguistics on the one hand, and educational ecology on the other hand, is paired with a direct empirical analysis of the students’ language learning experience at the USAMVBT University of Timisoara, Romania, the University of Tetova, North Macedonia, and Lomza State University from Poland. Our aim is to better understand how to sustain students’ communicational skills and their overall adaptation to the emerging digitalised educational environment across fields of study.



Angelini, M. L., & García-Carbonell, A. (2019). Developing English speaking skills through simulation-based instruction. Teaching English with Technology, 19(2), 3–20.

Banks, J. A. (2016). Cultural Diversity and Education. UK: Routledge.

Buabeng-Andoh, C. 2012. Factors Influencing Teachers’ Adoption and Integration of Information and Communication Technology into Teaching: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 8(1), 79–105.

Brown, J. S., (2002). Growing Up Digital: How the Web Changes Work, Education, and the Ways People Learn. USDL A Journal of the United States Distance Learning Association, 16(2), 10–20.

Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective, System, 39(4), 468–479.

Crawford, J. & al. (2020). COVID-19: 20 Countries’ Higher Education Intra-Period Digital Pedagogy Responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning, 3, 1–21.

Dede, C. & Barab, S. (2009). Emerging Technologies for Learning Science: A Time of Rapid Advances. J Sci Educ Technol, 18, 301–304.

Dobrila, M. C. (2021). Sharenting within online education in the context of the pandemic and children’s right to their own image and education. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 13(1).

Dragoescu Urlica, A. A., & Stefanović, S. (2018). Ecolinguistic Qualities of the Optimal English Language Experience. IJQR, 12(2), 537–546.

Huber, S. G., & Helm, C. (2020). COVID-19 and Schooling: Evaluation, assessment and accountability in times of crises. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32, 237–270. doi:10.1007/s11092-020-09322-y.

Kozma, R. B. (2011). ICT, Education Transformation, and Economic Development: An Analysis of the US National Educational Technology Plan. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8(2), 106–120.

Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

Kasbi, S. & Shirvan, M. E. (2017). Ecological understanding of foreign language speaking anxiety: emerging patterns and dynamic systems, Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(2).

König, J. & al. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (4), 608–622.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z. H. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman, pp. 51–58. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Luke, C. (2003). Pedagogy, connectivity, multimodality, and interdisciplinarity. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 397–403.

Male, T. & Burden, K. (2014). Access denied? Twenty-first century technology in schools. Technol Pedagog Educ 23(4), 423–437.

Neuwirth, L. S., Jović, S., & Mukherji, B. R. (2020). Reimagining higher education during and post-COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education.

OECD. (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, Accessed 23 March 2021.

Steffensen, S. V. & Kramsch, C. (2017). The ecology of second language acquisition and socialization. In: P. Duff & S. May (Eds.), Language socialization (pp. 17–28). Philadelphia: Springer.

Yurkiv, Y. & Krasnova, N. (2021). Civil Socialization of Youth in the Conditions of the Postmodern Information Society. Postmodern Openings, 12(1), 74–90.

How to Cite
Dragoescu Urlica, A. A., Kamberi, L., & Boguslawska-Tafelska, M. (2022). Communication and Language Learning in Virtual Environments through an Eco-semiotic Lens. LUMEN Proceedings, 17, 182-187.