The Coronavirus Pandemic and Sustainable Development. Case Study: Romania

  • Ionela-Daniela Gaitan (Botezatu) PhD., "Ștefan cel Mare" University, Suceava
  • Gabriela Prelipcean Professor Dr., "Ștefan cel Mare" University, Suceava
Keywords: sustainable development, objectives, coronavirus pandemic, effects, analysis

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic has affected all states in the world and the measures taken by governments to limit the spread of coronavirus have also left their mark on sustainable development goals, slowing their implementation or even regressing to some of these goals.

In the context in which the pandemic affected the Romanian economy and all segments of the population in all areas of the country, especially vulnerable groups, leading to an increase in existing disparities, the rapid implementation of sustainable development goals is the core of a sustainable and equitable recovery.

This paper presents effects of coronavirus pandemic on the sustainable development in Romania, especially on the objectives like no poverty, "zero" hunger, health and well-being, quality education, decent work and economic growth, industry, innovation and infrastructure and low inequalities, but also the solutions identified by various international bodies to reduce this impact.

Thus, the first part of the paper is a theoretical one, which presents the concept of "sustainable development" and analyses specialized studies that have presented the objectives of sustainable development, including studies that have shown the negative or positive effects of the coronavirus pandemic on these objectives.

The second part of the paper presents a descriptive analysis of the stage of sustainable development in Romania, after one year of coronavirus pandemic.

In carrying out this paper, qualitative research was used, based on methods such as descriptive analysis, analysis of official statistical data, study of reports and reference papers and synthesis of conclusions.

References

Brundtland Commission. (1987). Brundtland Report (Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf

Cerin, P. (2006). Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: A discussion on the coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis, Journal Ecological Economics, 56, 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.016

European Court of Auditors. (2020). Review No. 6 risks, challenges and opportunities in the EU economic policy response to the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. European Court of Auditors. https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/RW20_06/RW_Economic_response_to_Covid19_EN.pdf

Eurostat. (2021a). Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income - EU-SILC survey. Eurostat. https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?

dataset=ilc_di12

Evers, B. A. (2018). Why adopt the Sustainable Development Goals? The case of multinationals in the Colombian coffee and extractive sector [Master Thesis]. Erasmus University Rotterdamus Repository.

Global Hunger Index. (2021). Global hunger index scores by 2021. GHI rank. https://www.globalhungerindex.org/ranking.html

Gulseven, O., Al Harmoodi, F., Al Falasi, M., & Al Shomali, I. (2020). How the COVID-19 Pandemic Will Affect the UN Sustainable Development Goals?. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3592933

Khetrapal, S., & Bhatia, R. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health system & Sustainable Development Goal 3. Indian J Med Res, 151(5), 395–399. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1920_20

Klarin, T. (2018). The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 21(1), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2018-0005

Meadows, D.H. (1998). Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development. A report to the Balaton Group 1998. The Sustainability Institute. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/106023/mod_resource/

content/2/texto_6.pdf

Mee Kam, Ng. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Pandemic Planning, Planning Theory & Practice, 21(4), 507-512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1807130

OECD. (2020). The World Economy on a tightrope. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/economic-outlook/june-2020/

Sterling, S. (2010). Learning for resilience, or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education. Environmental Education Research, 16, 511-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505427

The Department Of Sustainable Development. (2020). Romania's national strategy for sustainable development. National Library of Romania. http://dezvoltaredurabila.gov.ro/web/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Romanias-Sustainable-Development-Strategy-2030.pdf

The World Bank. (2021). Poverty. Worldbank.com. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview#1

Thornton, J. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic has derailed progress on sustainable development goals, says WHO. BMJ, 369. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1969

United Nations. (1973). Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, 5-6 iunie 1972. United Nations Digital Library. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/523249?ln=en

United Nations. (1992b). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. In Report Of The United Nations Conference On Environment And Development. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf

Published
2022-01-11
How to Cite
Gaitan (Botezatu), I.-D., & Prelipcean, G. (2022). The Coronavirus Pandemic and Sustainable Development. Case Study: Romania. LUMEN Proceedings, 17, 228-240. https://doi.org/10.18662/wlc2021/24